// Case 1002 · Biological theory Evolutionary criminology →

Apocalypse (En Sabah Nur): The god who mistook evolution for a cull

Apocalypse, of X-Men, and evolutionary criminology: the first mutant reads survival of the fittest as a command and appoints himself judge of who deserves to live. Darwin described a process; he turns it into slaughter.

Poster of Apocalipsis, villain from X-Men
X-Men · Comics
Apocalypse
alias En Sabah Nur

The first scene of X-Men: Apocalypse (Bryan Singer, 2016) takes place in Egypt in 3600 BC. A crowd fills a pyramid to watch its god change bodies. The old mutant En Sabah Nur lies down beside a younger man and, in a ceremony of light, takes over that body to gain its power to heal. Meanwhile, a group of conspirators shouts “Death to the false god!” and brings the structure down. His four followers die and he is buried alive under the stone. He wakes up in Cairo in 1983, with Oscar Isaac’s face, absorbs what the television sets are saying about superpowers and nuclear weapons, and draws his conclusion: the weak have taken the Earth. He is Apocalypse, Marvel’s great mutant villain. Writer Louise Simonson and artist Jackson Guice created him, he debuted in X-Factor in 1986, he presents himself as the first mutant, born some five thousand years ago, and he lives by a single creed: survival of the fittest.

// The theoryWhat Darwin did not say

Evolutionary criminology was born from a book: Homicide (1988), by the psychologists Martin Daly and Margo Wilson. Their thesis is that homicide is not randomly distributed but follows patterns that fit the logic of natural selection. Most violent deaths are caused by young men against other young men, in disputes over status, respect or partners, which the two authors had called the young male syndrome in 1985. David Buss extended the idea in The Murderer Next Door (2005). But the theory is descriptive: it explains why certain impulses survived, not that we should obey them. The phrase Apocalypse keeps repeating is not even Darwin’s. “Survival of the fittest” was coined by the philosopher Herbert Spencer in 1864, and Darwin adopted it in 1869, in the fifth edition of On the Origin of Species, as a synonym for natural selection. The political use of that phrase, the idea that ruthless competition between people, classes or nations is natural and therefore good, later got a name: social Darwinism, popularized by the historian Richard Hofstadter in 1944.

Key concept

Three errors in a single creed

Apocalypse’s creed contains three errors that biology corrects. The first: fit does not mean strong. In biology, fitness measures how many descendants an organism leaves in a given environment; sometimes the biggest wins, and sometimes the smallest, the most inconspicuous or the best at cooperating. The second: selection has no judge. Nobody decides who passes the test, and a selector with a plan is not doing natural selection but artificial selection, the cattle breeder’s kind, which is the logic of eugenics. The third: selection does not act on an immortal individual. What evolution counts is generations; a being who changes bodies so he never dies is measuring his success by his own survival, which in Darwinian terms means nothing.

// The subjectThe judge of the species

In the comics, Apocalypse first appears in X-Factor #5 and #6 (1986), as the shadow steering the Alliance of Evil to capture Michael Nowlan, a mutant able to amplify the powers of others. Editor Bob Harras would later recall that the character arrived with a clear agenda, survival of the fittest, and with a new threat for mutants: someone who would judge them on their genetic worth, and who would destroy the weak whether they were mutants or not. The second moment comes in X-Factor #24 to #26 (1988), within the Fall of the Mutants saga. Apocalypse offers the team a place at his side in his evolutionary war against humans, and when they refuse, he introduces his Four Horsemen. One of them, Death, is their old teammate Angel, whom they believed dead after he lost his wings and whom Apocalypse has remade in his own image, with sharp metal wings. Then he unleashes the Horsemen on New York.

“Everything they’ve built will fall! And from the ashes of their world, we’ll build a better one!”Apocalypse to Magneto in the Auschwitz sequence, X-Men: Apocalypse (2016)

The third moment is his utopia fulfilled. In Age of Apocalypse (1995), an alternate timeline in which Charles Xavier dies young, Apocalypse conquers North America and organizes the “cullings,” extermination campaigns that kill millions of humans. The film condenses that program into three gestures. He takes Magneto to Auschwitz, the camp where his parents were killed, presents himself as the one who was there every time the forest of civilization needed a fire to renew itself, and teaches him to tear the camp out of the ground. Then he seizes Xavier and Cerebro to force the great powers to launch all their nuclear missiles into space, so that no one can interfere. Finally, he speaks to the planet through Xavier’s mind to tell the most powerful that the Earth will be theirs. (Spoiler warning.) Xavier manages to change the end of the message: those with the greatest power, he says, must protect those without. Storm and Magneto turn against Apocalypse, and Jean Grey burns him to ashes.

Apocalypse

En Sabah Nur · X-Men
INT 90MAN 82VIO 94EMP 4
Centuries-oldMessianicRelentless
Advertisement
In-article ad space (responsive)

Get the map of theories for free

Subscribe to the criminal archive —one case a week, no spam— and I'll send you The map of theories: the great currents of criminology on a single sheet.

// The crackA villain too convenient for the theory

Apocalypse does evolutionary criminology a dubious favor. On the one hand, he shows clearly what the theory is not: Daly and Wilson never said violence was good because it was ancient, and much of their work shows how much it depends on circumstances, because violence rises where competing for status pays off and falls when the environment changes. On the other hand, the character is a reminder of why the theory arouses so much distrust. Social Darwinism served as an alibi for forced sterilization laws, for scientific racism and for the racial hygiene policies of the twentieth century, and any biological explanation of violence carries that shadow. As early as 1902, the naturalist Peter Kropotkin replied in Mutual Aid that cooperation is also a factor of evolution. The film, without meaning to, proves him right: Apocalypse is not defeated by the strongest, but by a group acting together and by two of his Horsemen who decide to switch sides.

Nor does it help to dismiss him as a madman. His logic is that of many real perpetrators of mass violence, who rarely see themselves as murderers and almost always as surgeons: they clean, purify and prune what is left over. In the film, talking to Storm, he hesitates between two verbs, purge and save, as if they were the same. Explaining Apocalypse is not excusing him. That natural selection shaped our impulses does not make anyone its executioner, and whoever appoints himself arbiter of the species is not obeying nature: he is making a decision, and that decision is his own.

Why it matters

The word “fit” has killed too

Apocalypse’s creed is not a comic book fantasy. In 1927, in Buck v. Bell, the United States Supreme Court upheld the forced sterilization of people deemed “unfit,” and tens of thousands were sterilized in that country during the twentieth century. The vocabulary of the strong and the weak still appears today in speeches that justify violence against entire groups. Evolutionary criminology, used well, helps us understand where certain impulses come from so that we can contain them; used badly, it is Apocalypse’s handbook. The difference lies in never confusing what nature has done with what we ought to do.

In short

Three key ideas

  • Evolutionary criminology (Daly and Wilson, 1988; Buss, 2005) explains patterns of violence, such as the young male syndrome, through natural selection, but it is descriptive: what is adaptive is not therefore good.
  • Apocalypse (En Sabah Nur), created by Louise Simonson and Jackson Guice in X-Factor (1986), turns “survival of the fittest” into a mandate: he forms the Four Horsemen, carries out cullings in Age of Apocalypse and, in the 2016 film, wants to bring down everything humanity has built.
  • The crack: his creed confuses fitness with strength, invents a judge where evolution has none and repeats the social Darwinism that history has already seen turned into sterilizations and genocides.

Sources · further reading

  • Daly, M. and Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Wilson, M. and Daly, M. (1985). “Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: The young male syndrome”. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6(1), 59-73.
  • Buss, D. M. (2005). The Murderer Next Door: Why the Mind Is Designed to Kill. Penguin Press.
  • Hofstadter, R. (1944). Social Darwinism in American Thought. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Kropotkin, P. (1902). Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. Heinemann.
  • Simonson, L. and Guice, J. (1986). X-Factor #5-6. Marvel Comics.
  • Singer, B. (dir.) (2016). X-Men: Apocalypse. 20th Century Fox.

Case-file questionsFrequently asked questions

Who is Apocalipsis?

Apocalipsis (“En Sabah Nur”) is a villain from X-Men, analysed on KRIMINIS through the lens of criminology. He has spent five thousand years testing humanity the way one prunes a forest.

Why does Apocalypse (En Sabah Nur) become a villain?

Apocalypse, of X-Men, and evolutionary criminology: the first mutant reads survival of the fittest as a command and appoints himself judge of who deserves to live. Darwin described a process; he turns it into slaughter.

Which criminological theory explains Apocalipsis?

Apocalipsis's case is analysed through Evolutionary criminology. Evolutionary criminology (Martin Daly and Margo Wilson, Homicide, 1988) explains certain patterns of violence as strategies that natural selection favored in the past, without making them good. Apocalypse (En Sabah Nur), the first mutant of the X-Men comics, created by Louise Simonson and Jackson Guice in 1986 and the villain of X-Men: Apocalypse (2016), does exactly the opposite: he reads “survival of the fittest” as a mandate, appoints himself arbiter of who deserves to live and starts wars so that only the strong remain.

Share it𝕏Reddit
Cite this page

Citing it in a dissertation? How to do it right →

// Gild the card

Which idea best explains Apocalypse, according to this case file?

Get it right and the card for this villain turns gold in your album.