// Case 782 · Biological theory Hypoarousal →

Leuvis: Hunting children bored him; he wanted someone who could kill him

Leuvis and the low-arousal theory: the demon archduke of Goldy Pond, in The Promised Neverland manga, finds the hunting of defenceless children tedious. He only comes alive when prey can kill him. Adrian Raine has studied why some people need danger to feel anything.

Poster of Leuvis, villain from The Promised Neverland
The Promised Neverland · Anime
Leuvis
alias el Gran Duque

The Goldy Pond arc is one of the darkest stretches of The Promised Neverland manga, and the anime did not adapt it. After escaping Grace Field, Emma follows a lead to an abandoned human town that a group of demon aristocrats, the Poachers, have turned into a private hunting ground. Children bought from the farms, or who stumbled in by accident, are released there to be hunted for sport. Most of the Poachers enjoy the killing. Their most formidable member does not. Leuvis, an archduke of the demon royal family and the younger brother of the queen, finds the hunt boring: the children are too easy, and he has been killing for a thousand years. He becomes interested only when he meets prey with the will to kill him—first a man the children call Mister and his friends, years earlier, then Emma. He fights her fairly, lets her and her allies use whatever means they have, and thanks them for a worthy fight. The series makes him almost likeable. Criminology would describe him differently: as a predator in search of arousal.

// The theoryBoredom as a risk factor

The low-arousal theory of antisocial behavior has roots in Hans Eysenck's work in the 1960s, which linked extraversion and the search for stimulation to a nervous system that needs more input to reach a comfortable level of activation. Its strongest modern evidence comes from Adrian Raine and colleagues. The single best-replicated biological correlate of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents is a low resting heart rate; low skin conductance, another index of arousal, points the same way. Raine's longitudinal studies found that low arousal measured at age three predicted aggression years later. Two explanations are proposed, and they are complementary. The fearlessness account says that people who feel little physiological fear are less deterred by danger and punishment. The stimulation-seeking account says that low arousal is an unpleasant state, experienced as boredom, and that some people relieve it by seeking intense experiences, including risky or violent ones.

In a nutshell

Adrian Raine's research (The Anatomy of Violence, 2013)

Low resting heart rate is the best-replicated biological correlate of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents.

Key concept

Fearlessness and the search for stimulation

Leuvis displays both sides of the theory with almost diagrammatic clarity. Fearlessness: he remains calm and unfazed in situations that would shock anyone else, and even when Emma throws an axe at his comrade he barely reacts. Nothing in the hunt threatens him, so nothing in it affects him. Stimulation-seeking: precisely because the hunt is safe, it is dull. The only experiences that register are those with real stakes, and the highest stake is his own life. That is why he insists that everyone in a fight should put their life on the line, including himself; why he grants his opponents' requests and encourages them to use every advantage; why he is grateful to Emma for a fight in which he might have died. In Raine's terms, he has adapted to a chronic deficit by seeking the most intense stimulus available. In a world where he is apex predator, the most intense stimulus is someone who can kill him.

// The subjectA thousand years of killing

Leuvis's history makes his boredom understandable, which is not the same as acceptable. A thousand years ago, before the Promise, he slaughtered hundreds of humans fighting to end the war between the two races; the only survivor, Julius Ratri, asked him to take him to the king to make a deal, and the farms were born from that deal. Leuvis stayed away from politics; he was a fifth son in the royal line and court affairs did not interest him. Centuries later he watched his colleague Lord Geelan framed and condemned for a rebellion he knew was a sham, and did nothing. In the story's present he joins Bayon's Poachers in Goldy Pond, killing children he finds uninteresting and fixating on the one who resists. When he finally fights Emma and Lucas, he respects their courage and kills without hesitation the other children who get in the way. His fairness and his indifference come from the same place: nothing matters to him except the intensity of the fight.

Leuvis

the Archduke · The Promised Neverland
INT 80MAN 40VIO 97EMP 10
Bored by huntingSeeks someone who can kill himA thousand years of killing
Advertisement
In-article ad space (responsive)

Get the map of theories for free

Subscribe to the criminal archive —one case a week, no spam— and I'll send you The map of theories: the great currents of criminology on a single sheet.

// The crackA heart rate does not build a hunting ground

The low-arousal theory is one of the best-supported biological findings in criminology, and also one of the easiest to misread. Low heart rate is a risk factor, not a cause: most people with low arousal are not violent, and many become surgeons, pilots, mountaineers or bomb-disposal experts—stimulation-seeking channeled into legitimate risk. What turns the trait towards harm is environment: opportunities, models, the absence of other outlets. Leuvis's environment could not be more favorable. He belongs to an aristocracy that treats humans as livestock, has access to a hunting ground built for his entertainment, and answers to no one. The theory explains why he wants intense experiences; the society of the demons explains why the experience available to him is hunting children.

The second limit is that biological explanations can make an offender sound like a victim of his own physiology. The Promised Neverland resists that; it gives Leuvis a code, a choice and a history of choices. A predator who is bored by killing children is not less responsible for killing them, and the fact that he respects the one who fights back says nothing about the dozens who could not. What the theory adds is a warning about environments: places that give people with a craving for intensity a legitimate outlet produce mountaineers; places that give them a hunting ground produce Goldy Pond.

Why it matters

Channelling the need for intensity

Leuvis matters because the practical implications of low-arousal research are hopeful, and widely ignored. If some children are drawn to risk because their nervous system needs more stimulation, punishment is likely to work badly with them, since fear is precisely what they feel least. What tends to work better is providing legitimate high-stimulation outlets—sport, physical challenge, demanding activities—and early interventions that improve nutrition, exercise and enrichment, some of which Raine has shown can raise arousal and reduce later aggression. Leuvis had a thousand years and nothing better to do than hunt. A world that had offered him something else to fight might have produced a very different archduke.

In short

Three key ideas

  • The low-arousal theory (Eysenck; Raine) links chronically low physiological arousal—above all a low resting heart rate, the best-replicated biological correlate of antisocial behavior in young people—to fearlessness and to seeking intense stimulation.
  • Leuvis, the demon archduke of the Goldy Pond hunting ground in the manga, is bored by hunting defenceless children and comes alive only when facing prey that can kill him, like Emma. His calm, his fairness and his indifference to the other children all follow from that.
  • The crack: low arousal is a risk factor, not a cause, and many stimulation-seekers channel it into legitimate risk. The demon aristocracy and its hunting ground explain why his outlet was killing children.

Sources · further reading

  • Raine, A. (2013). The Anatomy of Violence: The Biological Roots of Crime. Pantheon.
  • Raine, A. (2002). "Annotation: The Role of Prefrontal Deficits, Low Autonomic Arousal, and Early Health Factors in the Development of Antisocial and Aggressive Behavior in Children". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(4), 417-434.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1964). Crime and Personality. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Shirai, K. and Demizu, P. (2016-2020). The Promised Neverland (manga). Shūeisha.

Case-file questionsFrequently asked questions

Who is Leuvis?

Leuvis (“el Gran Duque”) is a villain from The Promised Neverland, analysed on KRIMINIS through the lens of criminology. He was one of the strongest demons in his world and had been killing for a thousand years.

Why does Leuvis become a villain?

Leuvis and the low-arousal theory: the demon archduke of Goldy Pond, in The Promised Neverland manga, finds the hunting of defenceless children tedious. He only comes alive when prey can kill him. Adrian Raine has studied why some people need danger to feel anything.

Which criminological theory explains Leuvis?

Leuvis's case is analysed through Hypoarousal. The low-arousal theory holds that some people have a chronically low level of physiological arousal—a slower resting heart rate, a weaker skin response to stress—which they experience as boredom and compensate for by seeking intense, sometimes violent, stimulation. Adrian Raine has documented it in longitudinal studies; Hans Eysenck had anticipated it. Leuvis, the antagonist of the Goldy Pond arc, is a predator who no longer feels anything hunting defenceless prey and seeks only fights in which he might die. The theory explains his ennui; what it does not explain is the hunting ground others built around him.

Share it𝕏Reddit
Cite this page

Citing it in a dissertation? How to do it right →

// Gild the card

Which idea best explains Leuvis, according to this case file?

Get it right and the card for this villain turns gold in your album.