Madame Morrible invented the Wicked Witch of the West
For decades we believed the green woman was the villain, and that was exactly the plan. Oz's real enemy was writing the headlines.

For decades we all believed the green woman was the villain. That, exactly, was the plan. Wicked: For Good closes the story that began to bend the official narrative of Oz and puts the spotlight where it belonged: on Madame Morrible, the headmistress of Shiz played by Michelle Yeoh who works as the Wizard's propagandist. She is not an eccentric sorceress in the background; she is the hand that writes the headline. Elphaba is not born the Wicked Witch of the West: she is manufactured as one, word by word, fear by fear, until all of Oz learns to dread her.
That process —turning a person into a monster through the label others impose— has a name in criminology. It's called labeling theory, and its institutional flip side, moral panic, describes how fear amplified by the media ends up looking like proof that the threat was real. Morrible is the labeling machine; Elphaba, the labeled one. Understanding the mechanism does not absolve the propagandist who forges the lie: it names her.
// The theoryLabeling, in brief
In 1963, the sociologist Howard Becker published Outsiders and turned criminology's classic question inside out. He did not ask what is special about the deviant, but who has the power to call someone that. His thesis is as simple as it is uncomfortable: «social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance». In other words, deviance is not a quality of the act a person commits, but a consequence of the label others apply. The deviant is the one to whom the label has successfully stuck. You can read it developed in our file on labeling theory.
Becker added a decisive figure: the moral entrepreneurs. They are the ones who lead the crusades to create and enforce rules, who define what a danger is and who embodies it. They rarely act out of pure morality; they usually have interests. And that is where Morrible comes in: she is not a spectator of Oz's panic, she is its architect. Manufacturing a witch serves a regime that needs a common enemy to consolidate its power. The headline she writes does not describe a threat: it builds one.
The label doesn't describe the monster: it manufactures it
In labeling, the sequence matters. First comes the social reaction —the name, the accusation, the campaign—; the stigma comes afterward and reorganizes the identity of the person singled out. When an entire society treats Elphaba as «the Wicked Witch of the West», it shuts her out, denies her a voice and pushes her into the only role left to her. The label does not reveal a preexisting danger: it produces it and then takes it as proven.
And what happens when that label is amplified at the scale of a whole country? The sociologist Stanley Cohen called it moral panic in Folk Devils and Moral Panics (1972). It occurs when «a condition, episode, person or group of persons emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests». The media exaggerate and stylize the danger, experts appear to diagnose it, and the singled-out figure becomes a folk devil, a popular demon onto which all collective fear is projected. The panic, feeding on itself, ends up looking like confirmation that the threat existed all along.
Madame Morrible
Read Madame Morrible’s full case file · Labeling →
// The caseMorrible: the propagandist who forges the enemy
Morrible's power lies not in magic, but in the narrative. She is the voice that shapes the opinion of Oz, the one who translates diffuse fear into a concrete, green face. When the Wizard's regime needs to distract, unite and govern, Morrible delivers the product: a public enemy manufactured to order. Elphaba, who only asked for justice for the oppressed Animals, is relabeled as the danger itself. The dissident becomes, by propagandistic decree, «the Wicked Witch of the West». Her case file describes a textbook moral entrepreneur: the one who defines the threat and, in defining it, creates it.
Here the exact criminological piece fits. Morrible does not react to a dangerous witch: she manufactures the label and then orchestrates the moral panic that makes it plausible. The media of Oz amplify, the public fears her, and that fear is then displayed as proof of guilt. It is the perfect loop of labeling at state scale: the social reaction precedes the «crime», and the reaction, repeated to exhaustion, ends up fabricating the reality it claimed to denounce. Elphaba does not choose to be a witch; it is written over her.
// The same scriptManufacturing enemies, again and again
The pattern —power that labels, media that amplify, a public that fears— reappears throughout fiction about regimes and propaganda. The classic dystopia takes it to the extreme with ministries that invent traitors to keep the population mobilized; the political thriller repeats it with the scapegoat a government singles out to cover its own cracks. In all of them the same mechanics beat as in Morrible: you don't need to find a monster, it is enough to name one. The useful enemy is not discovered, it is designed, and its function is always the same: to unite the flock around fear.
Naming the factory is the first step to dismantling it
The criminological lesson is not that labels describe reality, but that sometimes they fabricate it. When power controls the narrative, it can turn a dissident into a popular demon with no evidence other than repetition. Knowing how moral panic works —who launches it, whom it benefits, how it feeds on itself— is what lets us doubt the headline before fearing the accused. Morrible is terrifying precisely because her weapon is not magic, but our willingness to believe whoever shouts loudest.
The witch factory, decoded
- Labeling theory (Becker, 1963) holds that deviance is not a quality of the act, but a consequence of the label the powerful successfully apply.
- Becker's moral entrepreneurs lead the crusades that define who the enemy is; Madame Morrible is their textbook version, a propagandist in the Wizard's service.
- Stanley Cohen's moral panic (1972) describes how the media amplify a threat until they create a folk devil, and the resulting fear seems to confirm the danger.
- Elphaba is not born the Wicked Witch of the West: she is manufactured as one by the social reaction Morrible orchestrates to consolidate the regime's power.
- The loop is perfect: the label precedes the «crime» and, once repeated, produces the reality it claims to denounce.
- Explaining how a villain is manufactured does not excuse the propagandist who forges the lie: Morrible chooses to ruin an innocent to keep her power.
Sources · further reading
- Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press.
- Cohen, S. (1972). Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
- Lemert, E. M. (1967). Human Deviance, Social Problems, and Social Control. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
// Quick challengeWhich theory best explains Madame Morrible?
All 2 chapters
- Madame Morrible invented the Wicked Witch of the West
- The Wizard of Oz: the fraud that becomes power in Wicked
Frequently asked questions
What is labeling theory?
It is a strand of the sociology of deviance formulated by Howard Becker in 1963. It holds that deviance is not an intrinsic property of an act, but the result of a powerful group successfully applying a label —«deviant», «criminal», «witch»— to a person. What turns someone into a deviant is not so much what they do, but the social reaction organized around them. That is why it matters who holds the power to name.
How does Madame Morrible fit labeling theory and moral panic?
Morrible is a moral entrepreneur in Becker's sense: she defines who the enemy is and, in defining it, creates it. As the Wizard's propagandist, she manufactures the «Wicked Witch of the West» label onto Elphaba and then orchestrates a moral panic, just as Stanley Cohen described in 1972: the media of Oz amplify the threat, the public fears it, and that fear is displayed as proof of guilt. Elphaba is not dangerous; she is manufactured as a danger to consolidate the regime's power.
Explaining Morrible with criminology —isn't that justifying propaganda?
No. Describing how labeling and moral panic manufacture an enemy explains the mechanism, it does not approve of it. At kriminis we sum it up like this: to explain is not to excuse. Morrible is not the victim of a blind process: she chooses to ruin an innocent to keep her power. Understanding how a witch is manufactured is precisely what makes it possible to doubt the headline and dismantle the factory, not to excuse whoever sets it in motion.