In chapter VII of the first part of A Study in Scarlet (Arthur Conan Doyle, 1887), Sherlock Holmes has Inspectors Gregson and Lestrade in his Baker Street sitting room when Wiggins, the leader of his street boys, announces that the cab is waiting downstairs. Holmes takes a pair of handcuffs from a drawer, shows off how well the spring works and asks for the cabman to come up and help with his luggage. Kneeling over a trunk, without turning his head, he asks the man to give him a hand with a buckle. There is a sharp metallic click, Holmes springs to his feet and introduces the inspectors to Mr. Jefferson Hope, the murderer of Enoch Drebber and of Joseph Stangerson. The cabman hurls himself at the window, smashes the glass, and it takes four men to subdue him. (Warning: this case file reveals the ending of the novel.)
// The theoryWhen two codes judge the same act
Hope is the murderer in the novel that introduced Holmes to the world, published in Beeton’s Christmas Annual for 1887. He is a hunter and silver prospector from the American West who, in London, makes his living as a cabman while he stalks two former Mormons from Utah. The tool for reading him is the culture conflict theory of Thorsten Sellin, who in 1938 published Culture Conflict and Crime for the Social Science Research Council. Its central idea is conduct norms: every group has its own rules about what is right, and they do not always match those of the criminal code, which usually belongs to the dominant group. Sellin distinguished a primary conflict, between different cultures, which arises when two culture areas meet, when one group imposes its law on another’s territory or when someone migrates, from a secondary conflict, within a single society that splits into subgroups. In both cases crime is born not from the absence of norms but from loyalty to other ones.
A man who passes through three codes
Hope’s story runs through three systems of norms. The first is the novel’s Utah, where the law is the Church’s: John Ferrier, Lucy’s adoptive father, was rescued in the desert on a single condition, that he embrace the faith, and Brigham Young reminds him that, under a supposed rule of Joseph Smith, a maiden of the faith may not marry a Gentile. The second is the frontier, the world of hunters and prospectors Hope comes from, where whoever has no court does justice for himself. The third is English law. What Hope does in London is murder only under the third; under the second, he calls it justice.
// The subjectThe hunter who became a cabman
The second part, “The Country of the Saints,” tells the origin. In chapter II, Hope rides Lucy Ferrier out of a stampeding herd of cattle on the outskirts of Salt Lake City, and before leaving for the Nevada mines he becomes engaged to her with her father’s consent. In chapter III, Brigham Young visits Ferrier and gives him a month for Lucy to choose a husband between Stangerson’s son and Drebber’s; every morning the number of days left appears written somewhere on the farm. In chapter IV, Hope returns in time and leads father and daughter out through the mountains. In chapter V, while he is out hunting, the pursuers catch up with them: he finds a grave bearing John Ferrier’s name and the date August 4th, 1860. Lucy, taken back to Salt Lake City, is forced to marry Drebber, and dies within a month. The night before the burial, Hope bursts into the house, kisses the dead woman’s forehead and takes the wedding ring from her finger.
He says it at the end of his confession, in chapter VI, before an inspector and with an aortic aneurysm that, a doctor has told him, is bound to burst within days. There he explains that, since no court could any longer convict those two men, he decided to be judge, jury and executioner all at once. He drove Drebber, drunk, in his cab to an empty house on the Brixton Road, showed him his face by the light of a candle and forced him at knifepoint to choose between two pills, one poisoned with an alkaloid he had stolen from the laboratory at York College; he swallowed the other himself. With the blood from his own nose he wrote RACHE, German for revenge, on the wall to put the police on a false trail. Stangerson, who refused to choose and flew at his throat, he stabbed at Halliday’s Private Hotel. The aneurysm bursts in his cell the night after his capture, before he can be brought before the magistrate.
Jefferson Hope
Get the map of theories for free
Subscribe to the criminal archive —one case a week, no spam— and I'll send you The map of theories: the great currents of criminology on a single sheet.
// The crackA Utah written from a single source
Culture conflict demands that both codes be seen as norms, and the novel sees only one. Its Utah is a regime of terror policed by the Danites, a secret band that kills dissenters and abducts women for the Elders’ harems. In 1991 the historian Michael W. Homer documented that Conan Doyle, who had never set foot in Utah, relied mainly on anti-Mormon books written by former Mormons. It shows in the details: the “thirteenth rule” of Joseph Smith that Young cites appears in no Mormon text (the thirteenth of his Articles of Faith is about honesty, not marriage), the angel Moroni appears as “Merona,” and the novel presents a Brigham Young of no more than thirty in May 1847, when he was forty-five. The Danites did exist as an armed group in Missouri in 1838, and the violence was real: in the Mountain Meadows massacre of 1857, Mormon militiamen killed some 120 emigrants. But the novel turns episodes into an all-seeing system. After visiting Salt Lake City in 1923, Conan Doyle himself called his picture of the Danites sensational and overcolored in Our Second American Adventure (1924), though in a letter of 1923 he had insisted that what he wrote about the Danites and their murders was historical and that he could not withdraw it.
The novel also idealizes Hope’s code. It attributes his thirst for revenge to what he may have learned from the Indians he had lived among, another stereotype, and sends him off with a placid smile in his cell, like a man who has done his work well. Explaining Hope is not excusing him. The novel takes the guilt of both men as given (according to Cowper, a Mormon, it was Stangerson who shot Ferrier, and Drebber married Lucy by force), but no court ever tried them: Hope was the sole judge of two men to whom he offered a choice between death and a coin toss. That is the risk Sellin did not want forgotten: understanding which code a conduct comes from does not oblige us to accept its victims.
Settle your feuds at home
In the closing pages, Holmes shows Watson a paragraph from the Echo newspaper: the case, it says, will serve as a lesson to all foreigners that they would do wisely to settle their feuds at home and not carry them onto British soil. It is the voice of the dominant code reading the crime as an imported affair. And the real history of Utah ran the opposite way from the novel: it was the federal government that turned the Mormon norm of plural marriage into a crime, with the Morrill Act of 1862 and the Supreme Court’s ruling in Reynolds v. United States in 1879, until the Church, with the Manifesto of 1890, officially gave up performing new plural marriages. That is Sellin’s culture conflict: a group whose norm becomes a crime because another group holds the power to write the law.
Three key ideas
- Culture conflict theory (Sellin, 1938) explains part of crime as the clash between the conduct norms of different groups: obeying one’s own code may mean breaking that of the group that writes the law.
- Jefferson Hope, the murderer of A Study in Scarlet (1887), loses Lucy Ferrier in the novel’s Utah and twenty years later executes Drebber, with two pills, and Stangerson, with a knife, in London, convinced that he is an officer of justice.
- The crack: the novel paints the Mormons with the anti-Mormon literature of its day and idealizes Hope’s revenge; the theory asks us to treat both codes as norms without turning explanation into excuse.
Sources · further reading
- Sellin, T. (1938). Culture Conflict and Crime. Social Science Research Council, Bulletin 41.
- Homer, M. W. (1991). “Arthur Conan Doyle and His Views on Mormonism: From A Study in Scarlet to The Edge of the Unknown”. A.C.D. The Journal of the Arthur Conan Doyle Society, 2(1).
- Bagley, W. (2002). Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows. University of Oklahoma Press.
- Doyle, A. C. (1887). A Study in Scarlet. Beeton’s Christmas Annual. Text at Project Gutenberg (no. 244).
Case-file questionsFrequently asked questions
Who is Jefferson Hope?
Jefferson Hope (“El cochero de Londres”) is a villain from Sherlock Holmes, analysed on KRIMINIS through the lens of criminology. He killed two men in London and declared himself as much an officer of justice as the policemen arresting him.
Why does Jefferson Hope (The London cabman) become a villain?
Jefferson Hope, the murderer of A Study in Scarlet, and culture conflict theory: a hunter from the American West who kills two men in London by frontier law after they sheltered in Utah behind the law of their Church.
Which criminological theory explains Jefferson Hope?
Jefferson Hope's case is analysed through Culture conflict. Culture conflict theory (Thorsten Sellin, 1938) explains part of crime as the clash between the conduct norms of different groups: whoever obeys the code of their own world may be breaking someone else’s. Jefferson Hope, the murderer of A Study in Scarlet (Arthur Conan Doyle, 1887), the first Sherlock Holmes novel, is an American hunter who watched his fiancée, Lucy Ferrier, die after a forced marriage in the Mormon Utah the novel portrays, and who twenty years later executes the two men responsible in London. The novel, however, builds that Utah out of the anti-Mormon literature of its day.








