Edward Hyde vs Juan Díaz de Garayo
Two villains, one criminological theory: Born criminal / Atavism. We compare Edward Hyde and Juan Díaz de Garayo: their profile, how dangerous they are, and where they meet and part.
Edward Hyde and Juan Díaz de Garayo share neither a film nor a universe, but they share something deeper: the same criminological theory explains them, Born criminal / Atavism. That makes their face-off more than a “who would win?”: it is the same mechanism of crime taking two different shapes. The biggest gap is in intelligence: Edward Hyde beats Juan Díaz de Garayo by 18 points.
The face-off · criminal profile
On paper, the more dangerous one is Edward Hyde, with a danger index of 67/100 against 64. But paper isn’t everything.
The index weighs violence, manipulation and intelligence, and subtracts empathy (the colder, the more dangerous). It is a reading for debate, not a sentence: the theory matters more than the score.
Edward Hyde
Juan Díaz de Garayo
Why does the same theory explain both?
Origins, authors, criticism and the case studies in depth.
Read “Born criminal / Atavism” →Frequently asked questions
Who is more dangerous, Edward Hyde or Juan Díaz de Garayo?
On the KRIMINIS danger index (violence, manipulation, intelligence and lack of empathy), Edward Hyde scores higher: 67 against 64 out of 100.
Which criminological theory explains Edward Hyde and Juan Díaz de Garayo?
The same theory sheds light on both: Born criminal / Atavism. That is what makes this a revealing duel: two different embodiments of the same criminal mechanism.
How do Edward Hyde and Juan Díaz de Garayo differ?
The biggest gap is in intelligence: Edward Hyde beats Juan Díaz de Garayo by 18 points.