// The versions of a villain

Tom Ripley: one villain, 4 versions

Tom Ripley is a murderer the reader follows to the very end, and each adaptation has had to decide what to do with that discomfort. Some punish him, some understand him and some simply watch him work.

How the reading shifts

  1. 1955Psychopathy
  2. 1960Deterrence Theory
  3. 1999Relative deprivation
  4. 2024Rational choice theory
1955Novel

The Talented Mr. Ripley

Patricia Highsmith

A perfect mask that hides not a monster but a void.

Psychopathy

Tom is a small-time New York con man whom Dickie Greenleaf’s father sends to Italy to persuade his son to come home. There he kills Dickie, takes over his identity, also kills Freddie Miles and ends up rich thanks to a forged will, though left wondering whether he will ever be caught. Highsmith tells it from the inside, without guilt. It is the reading KRIMINIS gives him: the successful psychopath, Cleckley’s mask hiding not a monster but a void filled with someone else’s life.

1960Film

Purple Noon

René Clément · Alain Delon

The cinema of its day needed to remind us that crime gets found out.

Deterrence Theory

In the French version, Alain Delon’s Ripley covets Philippe Greenleaf’s luxury, takes over his identity and his money, and seduces his girlfriend, Marge. But the ending changes the book: Philippe’s body surfaces when the boat is hauled out of the water and the police set a trap. Highsmith saw that ending as a concession to public morality. It is deterrence theory on screen: what curbs crime most is not the severity of the penalty but the certainty of being caught, and the film makes sure the audience learns it.

1999Film

The Talented Mr. Ripley

Anthony Minghella · Matt Damon

A young man with nothing, looking in at the life he craves.

Relative deprivation

Minghella builds a Ripley who becomes obsessed with Dickie and his privileged life in Italy: a young man with no means, looking in from outside at a world he longs for. He is no longer a cold void; the crime grows out of comparing himself with what others have and he does not. That is why relative deprivation reads him well: it blames not poverty itself but the feeling that you lack something you deserve. The ending is bleaker than the book’s: sobbing, Tom strangles Peter, the person closest to him, to avoid being found out.

2024TV series

Ripley

Steven Zaillian · Andrew Scott

Killing takes a moment; hiding it is exhausting work.

Rational choice theory

The Netflix series, eight episodes in black and white, returns to the Ripley closest to Highsmith’s: a small-time New York con man who, in Italy, kills and, above all, works. The camera lingers on every task: weighting Dickie’s body and sinking it at sea, hiding Freddie’s in his own car, cleaning up the blood, getting rid of the papers. It is rational choice seen from the inside: every step is a calculation of risks and rewards, and the suspense comes from the cost of each mistake. The crime is not an outburst but a job.

The 1955 novel leaves him unpunished; the 1960 film catches him to reassure the audience; the 1999 film looks for his wound in inequality and desire; the 2024 series watches him work with documentary coldness. Each era decides whether Ripley needs punishment, explanation or simply attention.

The archive reads them with Psychopathy · Read the case file →

Sources: en.wikipedia.org/wiki · en.wikipedia.org/wiki · en.wikipedia.org/wiki · es.wikipedia.org/wiki · en.wikipedia.org/wiki. All the villains with versions.