// Case 795 · Critical theory Postcolonial criminology →

Mola Ram (High priest): The priest who tore out hearts, and the colonial history that invented him

Mola Ram and postcolonial criminology: the villain of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom enslaves children and sacrifices men in the name of a sect the British turned into legend. Postcolonial criminology studies how empires defined who was a criminal in the colonies. The film repeats that definition almost word for word.

Poster of Mola Ram, villain from Indiana Jones
Indiana Jones · Film
Mola Ram
alias Sumo sacerdote

Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (Steven Spielberg, 1984) is set in 1935, a year before Raiders. After a plane crash, Indiana, the singer Willie Scott and the boy Short Round reach a village in northern India whose sacred stone has been stolen and whose children have disappeared. The trail leads to Pankot Palace, ruled by a child maharaja, and beneath it to the temple of a revived Thuggee cult that worships the goddess Kali. Its high priest is Mola Ram. Under his command, kidnapped children work as slaves in the mines, digging for the remaining Sankara stones, which he believes will give the cult enough power to spread across the world. In the most famous scene, he pulls the heart out of a sacrificial victim’s chest with his bare hand; the heart keeps beating, and the man is lowered into a pit of lava. He forces Indiana to drink blood that puts him under the cult’s spell. At the end, on a rope bridge over a river, Indiana invokes Shiva, the stones burn, and Mola Ram falls to the crocodiles. British troops arrive to finish the rescue.

// The theoryWho decides what crime looks like in a colony

Postcolonial criminology starts from a simple historical fact: in colonies, the definition of crime was written by the colonizers. Criminologists such as Biko Agozino and Chris Cunneen argue that the discipline grew up partly as a tool of empire, classifying colonized peoples, their customs and their resistance as criminal, and that its categories still bear that origin. The literary scholar Edward Said had shown in Orientalism (1978) how Western writing constructed “the East” as irrational, cruel and in need of control. British India produced two famous examples. In the 1830s, the official William Sleeman led a campaign against the thugs, presented as a hereditary religious brotherhood of stranglers devoted to Kali. Historians such as Kim Wagner and Martine van Woerkens have since shown that the reality—banditry on the roads—was transformed by colonial officials into a vast secret cult, partly to justify new powers of policing. And in 1871 the Criminal Tribes Act declared entire communities to be criminal by birth.

“Prepare to meet Kali... in hell!”Mola Ram to Indiana Jones, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984)
Key concept

The colonial script, scene by scene

The film follows the structure of the colonial narrative closely. The native religion as criminal: Kali is shown not as a Hindu goddess worshipped by millions but as the patron of murder. The ruler as corrupt or captive: the young maharaja is under the cult’s spell, and Indian authority is either complicit or helpless. The banquet of horrors: the palace dinner of snakes, beetles and monkey brains presents Indian culture as grotesque. The rescuers: an American adventurer and a column of British soldiers save the villagers. Every element repeats the image the British used to justify their rule: a society that cannot govern itself and needs outside protection from its own superstitions. Mola Ram is the culmination of that image. He is not a person with a history, but the embodiment of the colonial fear of the East.

// The subjectA villain without a country of his own

Inside the story, Mola Ram’s crimes are clear and serious: child slavery, human sacrifice, the drugging and control of a child ruler, and a project of domination that he describes as the destruction of the British, then of other religions, until Kali reigns. He is charismatic, theatrical and absolutely certain. What the film never gives him is context. We do not learn who he was, why the cult revived or what it means to the people of the region beyond terror. The villagers who lost their children are shown as helpless and grateful. The Indian characters are either victims, servants or fanatics. The film’s production history shows how sensitive this was at the time: the makers were refused permission to shoot in India, filmed the Indian scenes in Sri Lanka, and the finished film was banned by the Indian censors when it was released.

Mola Ram

High priest · Indiana Jones
INT 75MAN 88VIO 95EMP 2
Tears out heartsChild slaves in the mineThe empire’s villain
Advertisement
In-article ad space (responsive)

Get the map of theories for free

Subscribe to the criminal archive —one case a week, no spam— and I'll send you The map of theories: the great currents of criminology on a single sheet.

// The crackA theory of images, not of acts

Postcolonial criminology explains Mola Ram as a representation much better than as a criminal. Inside the fiction, enslaving children and killing people are crimes under any culture’s standards, and the theory does not deny that. Its point is different: it asks why this particular villain was imagined this way, which history he draws on and whose interests that history served. There is a risk of overstating the case: Temple of Doom is a pulp adventure that copies the serials of the 1930s, including their prejudices, more than a deliberate piece of propaganda. Spielberg himself later said it was the film in the series he liked least. But the old serials were themselves products of the colonial imagination, and copying them without question reproduces what they carried.

The second limit is the opposite risk: treating all violence in colonized societies as an invention of the colonizers. Banditry on the roads of nineteenth-century India was real, and it had real victims; what the historians question is the scale, the religious explanation and the use the empire made of it. Mola Ram is a fictional criminal, responsible for his fictional crimes. The film that made him is responsible for something else: for turning a goddess and a whole country into the scenery of a nightmare, using the same picture the empire had painted to rule them.

Why it matters

The long life of colonial categories

The Criminal Tribes Act was repealed in 1949, after independence, but the communities it labeled were reclassified as “denotified” and “habitual offender” groups, and many still report discrimination by police. The thuggee myth continues to appear in novels, films and video games. Postcolonial criminology argues that the categories created to govern colonies did not disappear with the empires: they live on in police practices, in laws and in the images audiences consume as entertainment. Mola Ram is a vivid example of how a colonial administrator’s report can end up, a century and a half later, in one of the most watched adventure films in history.

In short

Three key ideas

  • Postcolonial criminology (Agozino, Cunneen; Said as a forerunner) studies how colonial powers defined crime and criminals in the colonies, and how those categories survive. In British India, the thuggee campaign of the 1830s and the Criminal Tribes Act of 1871 are its classic examples.
  • Mola Ram, high priest of a revived Thuggee cult in Temple of Doom (1984), enslaves children in the mines, sacrifices a man by pulling out his heart and controls the child maharaja, until he falls from a rope bridge. The film was refused filming in India and banned there on release.
  • The crack: the theory explains the villain as an image, not his acts in the story, and must not deny that real banditry existed. Each answers for its own: Mola Ram for his crimes; the film for repeating the empire’s picture of India.

Sources · further reading

  • Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
  • Agozino, B. (2003). Counter-Colonial Criminology: A Critique of Imperialist Reason. Pluto Press.
  • Wagner, K. A. (2007). Thuggee: Banditry and the British in Early Nineteenth-Century India. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Van Woerkens, M. (2002). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India. University of Chicago Press.
  • Spielberg, S. (dir.) (1984). Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. Paramount Pictures / Lucasfilm.

Case-file questionsFrequently asked questions

Who is Mola Ram?

Mola Ram (“Sumo sacerdote”) is a villain from Indiana Jones, analysed on KRIMINIS through the lens of criminology. He pulls the heart out of a living man’s chest, raises it and shows it beating.

Why does Mola Ram (High priest) become a villain?

Mola Ram and postcolonial criminology: the villain of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom enslaves children and sacrifices men in the name of a sect the British turned into legend. Postcolonial criminology studies how empires defined who was a criminal in the colonies. The film repeats that definition almost word for word.

Which criminological theory explains Mola Ram?

Mola Ram's case is analysed through Postcolonial criminology. Postcolonial criminology (Agozino, Cunneen, with Said as a forerunner) studies how colonialism manufactured categories of crime and of criminal for colonized peoples, and how those categories survive in institutions and in images. Mola Ram, high priest of a Thuggee sect that worships Kali in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984), is a villain built from the material of that history: the British myth of thuggee, the Victorian fear of India’s religions and the figure of the colonial officer who arrives to save the natives from themselves.

Share it𝕏Reddit
Cite this page

Citing it in a dissertation? How to do it right →

// Gild the card

Which idea best explains Mola Ram, according to this case file?

Get it right and the card for this villain turns gold in your album.