// FILM · AVATAR · CODE OF THE STREET

Varang and the code of fire: abandonment turned into law in Avatar

In a Pandora of lava and ash, the Mangkwan worship fire and only the strong survive. Varang didn't invent that world, but she has chosen to perpetuate it.

Share
Artwork for the article “Varang and the code of fire: abandonment turned into law in Avatar”
Varang · la Tsahìk del fuego

Pandora is no longer just the blue of the jungle and the turquoise of the ocean. In Avatar: Fire and Ash, James Cameron opens a third Pandora: the one of ash. There lives Varang (Oona Chaplin), Olo'eyktan and Tsahìk —leader and spiritual guide— of the Mangkwan, the «Ash People». They are Na'vi, but not the ones we knew: they have grown up in a hostile volcanic land, they worship fire instead of Eywa, and they live by a simple, merciless law: only the strong survive. Varang is not a monster fallen from the sky; she is what that world manufactures.

That idea —that an environment where no one protects ends up generating its own code of violence— is not science fiction. It has a name in criminology: the code of the street, described by sociologist Elijah Anderson in 1999. Varang is that code raised to myth: the leader who inherits abandonment and turns it into religion. Understanding her logic does not absolve her; it lets us see where the chain that runs from destitution to conquest can be broken.

// The theoryThe code of the street, in brief

In Code of the Street (1999), Elijah Anderson studied the most impoverished neighborhoods of Philadelphia and described something that goes beyond individual crime. Where the institutions that should protect —the police, stable work, justice— fail or abandon people, an informal code emerges to take their place. In that code, respect is the most valuable currency: it is earned, defended and lost in public. And because there is no one to turn to when you are attacked, a readiness for violence becomes a form of life insurance. You can read it developed in our file on the code of the street theory.

Anderson's key point, and what makes it uncomfortable, is this: violence in those environments is not a pathological trait or an essential evil, but an adaptation. Most families are what he calls «decent» and long for a peaceful life, but even they must learn to navigate the code so as not to be crushed. Showing weakness invites predation; projecting toughness deters it. So the violent norm reproduces not because people are bad, but because in the absence of protection it works. It is a rational response to an irrationally dangerous world.

Key concept

Where no one protects, strength becomes law

The code of the street emerges in the void left by institutions. When you cannot trust that someone will defend you, your safety depends on your reputation for strength: respect earned through toughness keeps predators away. Violence stops being an anomaly and becomes normative —what is expected, what grants status— by pure adaptation to abandonment. Varang rules a world exactly like that: no Eywa to shelter her, no kind sky, only ash and the law of the strongest.

It is worth separating two things the code entangles. Anderson insists that toughness is, at its origin, defensive: it is born of fear and of the lack of alternatives. But once installed, the system rewards whoever embodies it best, and the line between defending oneself and dominating blurs. The respect that began as a shield can become a throne. That is where the mechanism explains but does not excuse: the environment deals the cards, but each player still chooses how to play them.

Varang

Avatar
INT 70MAN 72VIO 88EMP 12
FanaticalRuthlessSurvivor

Read Varang’s full case file · Code of the street →

// The caseVarang: abandonment turned into religion

The Mangkwan are the perfect illustration of a world without protective institutions. There is no Eywa to hear their prayers nor a generous land to feed them: there is lava, ash and scarcity. In that context, toughness is not gratuitous cruelty, it is the price of staying alive. Varang, as Tsahìk, does not only lead; she gives meaning. And the meaning she offers is that of fire: a faith that sacralizes strength and turns the survival of the fittest into a spiritual mandate. Her case file describes a leader who did not invent her world, but who has decided to perpetuate it.

This is where Varang embodies the code of the street written in mythic key. The respect that in a neighborhood is defended with fists, she elevates into clan doctrine: whoever hesitates falls; whoever shows weakness does not deserve the ash they walk on. Her people's abandonment —real, historical, painful— gives her an explanation and even a legitimacy before her own. But Cameron's story does not leave her hidden behind that alibi: Varang does not merely protect the Mangkwan from hunger, she chooses conquest. And there the code stops explaining everything. The environment hardened her; the expansion she chose herself.

Fire does not forgive the weak. Neither do we.Interpretation of the Mangkwan ethos in Avatar: Fire and Ash (2025)

// The same scriptFrom abandonment to the law of the strongest

The pattern —forsaken communities that manufacture their own violent code— runs through much of survival fiction. The hardened clans of post-apocalyptic wastelands, the gangs that rule neighborhoods the state never reaches, the groups that, in the shipwreck of civilization, erect strength as the only morality: all share the same root with the Mangkwan. They are not pure evil, they are adaptation to a world that withdrew all protection. The difference between them usually lies in whether the leader uses that toughness to shield their own or to subjugate others. Varang crosses that border, and that is why she is a villain and not simply a survivor.

Why it matters

The code explains violence, it does not command it

The criminological lesson of the code of the street is not that abandonment condemns people to violence, but that violence is its predictable response when protection is missing. Anderson saw it clearly: restoring reliable institutions —security, justice, opportunity— defuses the code, because people prefer peace when peace is possible. Varang is fearsome because no one offered her another world; but she remains responsible because, having the power to give her people something better, she chooses fire and conquest.

In short

Varang and the code of fire, decoded

  • The code of the street (Anderson, 1999) describes how, where protective institutions fail, an informal norm emerges in which respect is the currency and readiness for violence is survival.
  • The violence of that code is adaptation, not pathology: it is born of fear and the lack of alternatives, not of an essential evil.
  • The Mangkwan live that void taken to the extreme: without Eywa, in a volcanic land, they worship fire and consecrate the law of the strongest.
  • Varang is the code written in mythic key: as Tsahìk, she turns her people's defensive toughness into spiritual clan doctrine.
  • Abandonment explains her hardening, but not her expansion: Varang chooses conquest, and there the adaptation stops excusing her.
  • To explain Varang is not to excuse her: it signals that restoring protection and alternatives —not rewarding strength— is what breaks the cycle.

Sources · further reading

  • Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Anderson, E. (1994). «The Code of the Streets». The Atlantic Monthly, 273(5), 81-94.
  • Cameron, J. (dir.) (2025). Avatar: Fire and Ash. 20th Century Studios.

// Quick challengeWhich theory best explains Varang?

Frequently asked questions

Who is Varang in Avatar: Fire and Ash?

Varang, played by Oona Chaplin, is the leader (Olo'eyktan) and spiritual guide (Tsahìk) of the Mangkwan, the «Ash People», a Na'vi clan of Pandora hardened by a harsh volcanic land. Unlike the Na'vi we knew, they worship fire instead of Eywa and live by a brutal rule where only the strong survive. She is one of the main villains of the third installment of James Cameron's saga.

What is Elijah Anderson's code of the street and how does it fit Varang?

The code of the street, described by sociologist Elijah Anderson in 1999, is an informal norm that emerges where protective institutions —police, justice, employment— abandon people. In that void, respect becomes the currency and readiness for violence a survival mechanism. Violence is normalized by adaptation, not by pathology. Varang embodies that code taken to the mythic: her people, forsaken in a world without Eywa, sacralize strength as the only law.

Explaining Varang with the code of the street —isn't that justifying her violence?

No. The code explains why in abandoned environments violence becomes the norm, but it does not command or approve of it. At kriminis we sum it up like this: to explain is not to excuse. Anderson himself showed that restoring protection and opportunity defuses the code, because people prefer peace when it is possible. Varang had the power to offer her people another path and still chose conquest: the environment hardened her, but the decision to dominate was hers.